Q & A Database

The GIPS Standards Q&A database contains questions and answers (Q&As) on various searchable topics that provide additional interpretation on an issue. Q&As are considered to be authoritative guidance and must be followed in order to claim compliance with the GIPS standards.

Content from prior Q&As was included in the GIPS Standards Handbook as much as possible and many Q&As were archived. Change the Status drop-down filter to "Archived" to see the archived Q&As.

The GIPS Standards Helpdesk is available for individual questions and typically responds to inquiries within 3 business days.

Search by category, status, date range, and/or keyword.

1 Result
  • Archived

    Effective: 1 November, 2012 - 31 December, 2019
    Categories: Discretion
    Source: GIPS Handbook, 3rd Edition

    Firm C manages a portfolio that recently had new investment restrictions placed on it by the client, rendering it non-discretionary. Should the firm retroactively remove that portfolio from its composite?

    No. The firm must not retroactively remove that portfolio from its composite. Firm C has the responsibility for creating its own definition of discretion and applying this definition consistently over time to all portfolios. A portfolio that changes from discretionary to non-discretionary status due to a new client-imposed restriction must be removed from a composite on a prospective basis only.

    Please also see original Q&A